/study / lectures / Intraop I
Awareness — Risk Factors, BIS, Brice Questionnaire
TEXTIntraop I · 8 min read
Routine cases: 1-2 per 1000. Cardiac, OB, trauma: much higher. End-tidal MAC ≥0.7 or BIS 40-60 — pick one, do it well.
After this lesson you can
3 min read7 sections- Identify high-risk awareness scenarios.
- Use BIS/SedLine/PSI appropriately.
- Prevent awareness with multimodal strategy.
- Respond to a patient who reports awareness.
Incidence + risk factors
- cardiac surgery (~1%)
- OB emergency C-section under GA (~1%)
- trauma (up to 10%)
Common thread: hemodynamic instability constrains anesthetic depth.
- chronic opioid + benzo + ketamine users (tolerance)
- history of awareness
- TIVA without depth monitoring
- MAC <0.7 by clinical necessity
- paralyzed for the case (no motor signs to alert)
- female sex
- age <60
- ASA 3-5
- light-anesthetic intentional plans
Document predictors in the pre-op note and the plan that mitigates them.

B-Aware → BAG-RECALL — what the trials actually showed
B-Unaware (Avidan, NEJM 2008): BIS-guided vs end-tidal-anesthetic-concentration (ETAC) guided — equivalence.
BAG-RECALL (2011, NEJM): same equivalence in larger high-risk cohort.
Clinical reading: either protocol-driven monitoring works (BIS 40-60 OR ETAC ≥0.7 MAC); the discipline of the protocol matters more than the technology.
Both clearly beat no-protocol practice.

BIS 40-60 vs end-tidal ≥0.7 MAC — when to pick which
- free with any modern machine
- universally available
- evidence-equivalent in most settings
Default for volatile-based balanced anesthesia.
BIS adds value when you can't get a useful MAC reading: TIVA (no end-tidal volatile), cardiac/critical cases tolerating MAC <0.7 by necessity, MH-trigger-free anesthetic with TIVA in MH-susceptible patient.
- lag
15-30 sec - EMG + cautery artifact
- unreliable with ketamine + N₂O + dexmedetomidine (all alter EEG without proportional sedation)
- cerebral injury or low temperature distorts
Don't toggle between monitors mid-case — pick one and commit.

Common process failures that drive awareness
- end-tidal MAC alarm on
- BIS as backup
- vigilance during the first 5 min + first incision (peak awareness windows)

Modified Brice questionnaire
Five questions, asked at 24 hr + 7 days + 30 days (recall sometimes delayed): (1) What is the last thing you remember before falling asleep?
Positive screen = explicit recall of intra-op eventsSensitivity high; specificity lower (dreams + PACU memories misclassified).
Confirm with detailed structured interview + chart review by the M&M committee or designated reviewer.
When awareness occurs — disclosure + PTSD prevention
Document the Brice findings + your conversation.
Notify surgeon, risk management, and provide written ASA awareness brochure.
Arrange psychological evaluation within 1-2 weeks — PTSD develops in 30-50% of awareness victims without intervention.
Open disclosure + structured follow-up significantly reduces PTSD.
QI: bring case to M&M, identify the process failure (one of the patterns above), implement systems change.
Patient should be flagged for awareness-prophylaxis protocol at any future anesthetic.

Adjunct strategies in high-risk cases
- scopolamine
0.4 mg IVpre-bypass (amnestic) - midazolam
0.05 mg/kgsupplements - BIS-guided depth during low-MAC pump time
- isoflurane on bypass via oxygenator (target gas-analyzer concentration)
- ketamine
0.5 mg/kgsupplements during massive transfusion (preserves hemodynamics + adds amnesia) - scopolamine if anticipating need for low MAC
- midazolam after stabilization
- brief midazolam
1-2 mgafter cord clamp (avoid before — neonatal depression) - ketamine
0.5 mg/kg - ensure ETAC ≥1 MAC after delivery
Across all high-risk: never substitute paralytic for anesthetic.
Paralyzed-but-awake is the worst-case scenario.

⚠ Common pitfalls
- Trusting BIS alone in ketamine, N₂O, or dexmedetomidine cases — false readings.
- Skipping depth monitoring during TIVA with paralysis — highest awareness risk.
- Dismissing a patient's awareness report — long-term PTSD implications.
- Aiming for BIS 40-60 in elderly without considering frailty — burst suppression risk.
💎 Clinical pearls
- Awareness incidence ~0.1-0.2% overall; ~1% in cardiac, OB, trauma — higher in these.
- BAG-RECALL trial: BIS-guided vs ETAC-guided showed equivalent awareness rates; both work.
- Brice questionnaire post-op for high-risk cases — early detection allows early support.
- If awareness reported: validate, document, refer to psych — do NOT dismiss as dream.
Recap
- Awareness incidence ~0.1-0.2% overall; ~1% in cardiac, OB, trauma — higher in these.
- BAG-RECALL trial: BIS-guided vs ETAC-guided showed equivalent awareness rates; both work.
- Brice questionnaire post-op for high-risk cases — early detection allows early support.
- If awareness reported: validate, document, refer to psych — do NOT dismiss as dream.
Mark each section done to complete the module.